Wendy Lauzon

Championing Tapestry 

Examining my personal relationship with fibre and fibre arts seems odd because it has been a constant in my life, begun when I learned to embroider pillow cases at a young age. I have never wavered in my singular devotion to fibre arts. I cannot say definitively what it is about fibre in general, and tapestry specifically, that both compels and fulfills me more than any other medium. I grew up during a time of binary gender defined roles – girls were expected to learn home keeping skills in preparation for their ultimate duty of marrying, taking care of a husband, and raising a family. It was about the same time that women’s liberation and women’s rights movements gained momentum, challenging these traditional ideals and role expectations for women, although the women of the Bauhaus had worked in earnest to elevate ‘women’s work’ four decades earlier, in defiance of the gendered workshops (T’ai Smith BWT 36). Pursuing a degree in fibre arts was, for me, primarily to learn new skills and techniques, but in all honesty, it would also be a piece of paper that celebrated, valued, and legitimized what I have always loved to do, and thereby who I am. Why Bother author Quinton’s conversations with artists acknowledge this relationship with traditional hand work in an environment of industrialization and technology (1). 

Wendy Lauzon, “Weaving Under the Arch,” 30 in x 55 in, 10 epi, 2018, photo: Wendy Lauzon. Cotton seine warp, wool weft. Collection of the artist.

As a mature student at the Alberta College of Art + Design (ACAD), I felt unsure about the  conceptual fortitude, and therefore, the validity of my work as ‘art.’ My strength was the ‘finish,’ the very thing Greenberg declared the definition of craft, and thereby, the antithesis of art (Auther 35). Audible in many contexts at ACAD, ‘the Bauhaus’ introduced me to Gunta Stolzl’s tapestry. Stolzl wove in an environment that saw tapestry as a “degraded version of painting” (T’ai Smith 2) and set out to challenge that mindset, even as some modern painters and sculptors sought to translate their paintings and sculptures to tapestry (Johnson 39). T’ai Smith articulated what resonated with me in Stolzl’s work – that tapestry is a union of design and fabrication (3), a textile of explicit and implicit meaning. Since weaving was new to me, I found it easier to direct conceptually, because that is the only way I had employed it in my practice. My associations with other crafts are so personal, I sometimes find it a challenge to recognize their potential to achieve other than the functional and beautiful. Whitford concurs saying “the most interesting parts of the imagination are closed off by logic and reason.” (44)  

Though the technique may be ancient, weavers bring contemporaneity to the process (Darlaston 38), integrating its historical past with a contemporary relevance (Glusica 135; Morton 334).  Leigh describes the handmade as “potently meaningful in contemporary culture.” (36) Key to the finished weaving is the vision (Glusica 133) and the personality (Hung15) of the weaver/artist. Mary Black, a nurse in the 1920’s, subverted political content for her purposes (329), and this is now what often forms the basis an artist’s work (Sherwin np). Indeed, contemporary art in general, and weaving in particular, has been employed to comment on such topics as politics (Sherwin), the feminine (Weissberg 665), the femme fatale (Noegel) and the feminist (Auther 97). It is a vehicle of activism, and a object of documentation (Deacon and Calvin 7). What is relevant to one generation may not be to another (Green 54), consequently weaving, an ever evolving practice (Green 58), with a reiterative evolution from pragmatic to theoretical construct (T’ai Smith BWT xvii), has afforded artists many points of entry throughout history. Johnson is therefore justified in claiming tapestry is “among the most ancient and the most modern of art forms.” (37)  

I like that weaving affords me some type of existential connection with past generations and cultures. “No matter how esoteric our occupations, we delight in diving back into the jobs our species had so many thousand years ago. How far, really, is the labor of a fiber artist like Sheila Hicks from that of someone carrying an armload of reeds to the door of a cave?.” (Kooser 10) At the loom, we are not unlike the weavers of Jarmo, women thought to be the earliest weavers (Barber 78). Weaving technology survives fundamentally unchanged since its inception millennia ago (Hearle 87), and hand and loom weaving methods in certain parts of the world appear to have never changed at all (Barber 80). Gogarty (4-5) and Hung (11) see tapestry as a rebellion against the ubiquity of mass production and digital technology. Having grown up before the onslaught of technology, I think this is significant to weaving’s appeal for me – there will be no power outage or lost computer file to upset my work, and, instead of virtually creating something, I am physically handling the elements of my work. The weaver’s personal identity, a sense of self, of being and becoming, is, at least in part, attributable to this sense of continuity with the past. (Yda Smith 27) Darlaston’s weaving residency in a local library inspired embodied responses of onlookers, from breathless appreciation to mimicking hand motions (35). She saw the evidence for Volpe’s claim that the gesture of weaving is an ancient memory in us all. (Darlaston 36) Darlaston also recognized Laura Marks’ “haptic look” in members of her audience, where seeing causes the body to react as if touching. (Darlaston 36) Gogarty acknowledges that it is textile’s materiality that attracts the gaze. (12) Glusica addresses this phenomena by offering a “touch sample” for viewers to satisfy the compulsion to handle woven fabric. (134) The physical body is still the primary way of experiencing the world. (Gogarty 12) 

I derive a therapeutic solace while weaving, and this aspect has a notable history. Salom’s article, about the role museums can play in providing art therapy interventions for displaced indigenous women, talks about “artistic containment,” (51) “therapeutic holding environment(s) grounded in emotional safety.”(59)  While a contemplative relationship with the tapestry loom may be less likely where productivity rules, (Barber 33) no doubt it was enjoyed in the sequestered spaces of ancient (female) royalty. (Barber 210) The weaving artist works in an individualized space that permits an evolving identity, removed from external influence, via the generative process of craft making. (Darlaston 36) Weaving was central to the occupational therapy provided by Black to address the diverse consequences of industrialization: post war disability, (Morton 325), post traumatic stress, (Morton 328) and even upper middle class neurosis. (Morton 330) Something I could take away from Black’s work is the realization that aesthetics (read perfectionism!) should not come at the expense of the therapy weaving provides. (Morton 331) As recognized in the Bauhaus, embracing failure also affords celebrating the spectacular. (Gogarty 7) Leigh talks about a special state of mind induced by extended periods of repetition in craft making, both meditative and therapeutic. (38) More recently, various restorative initiatives have been undertaken that (re)introduce weaving to women whose cultural and domestic stability have been compromised to various degrees, (see Cross, Findly, Green, Sahagun, Salom, Shuzhong and Prott, Yda Smith) reinstating a sense of dignity and self respect, whether a former tradition, or newly adopted coping mechanism. On a much smaller scale, I too have benefitted from these qualities of weaving that have mitigated the strain of personal struggles.  Tapestry has a historically diverse application as narrative, whether historical – tapestry conveyed and helped to interpret, and at times even influenced, historical meaning (Astington 127), or personal – Salom describes weaving as personal storylines and visual narratives created nonverbally. (58) Gogarty shares an anecdote of an African culture that believes language and weaving came to be at the same time. (6) Its imagery draws out memories and stories, and restores gaps in cultural history. (Deacon and Calvin 11) Craft actualizes our desire for expression. (Leigh 35) At the very least, weaving provides the fundamental pleasure of ‘making.’ (Leigh 38).. Fibre allows me to create a woven narrative that fills a void of personal cultural tradition – that which I have adopted, borrowed or appropriated, is, in the end, made my own. While the tradition of making in my family was rooted in penny pinching, it was not long before I began to focus more on the opportunity it presented to customize and personalize what I made, to separate myself from the masses, akin to what Gogarty refers to as “a challenge to our increasingly standardized environment.” (6) Weaving fits in my fibre ‘alpha-omega’ experience – I can make the cloth with which I will make other things. There is a delightful challenge in being able to unpack a product and its process, to its origin, or essence.  

Gunta Stolzl. “Slit Tapestry Red/Green.” 1927-1928, tapestry, Bauhaus-Archiv, Berlin. http://library.artstor.org/asset/SS36187_36187_26778482. Web. 22 Nov 2017.

Warping the loom is a straightforward process so the loom is soon ready for weaving. The real work begins after that. Tapestry technique involves the hand and the eye working cooperatively in a manner that far exceeds coordination; the hands work to realize what the artist is attempting to create, while the eyes judge their success. Each session at the loom is what Gogarty refers to as a process of “constant interpretation and translation.” (7) Working simultaneously in the conceptual, aesthetic and technical realm, decision making involves knowing that tapestry is the right medium for the message, what image will convey the concept, the dimensions, when to shift colours, when to separate features with a hard or blended edge, how firmly to pack the weft. Working with colour, particularly how proximity influences the appearance of colour, extends the possibilities. Whitford recognizes the fact that “often a poverty of content results in a richness of concept, a paring away of the superficial to reveal the fundamental.”(19) Artist Kiki Smith articulated the challenges I experience bringing my ideas to life saying, “My suffering is that I see that there are these really great forms. They’re holy in a way, like they have this really incredible power about them. And all I can do is recognize it.” (http://www.theartstory.org/artist-smith-kiki.htm) 

The intellectual rigour of tapestry may, in fact, be unparalleled in the art world. Artists like Hannah Ryggen, who builds her designs while actively weaving her tapestries as opposed to following a cartoon (Sherwin np), challenges the thinking that weaving is subordinate to painting because it merely reproduces an image. (Mathison 20) In “Pictures Made of Wool,” T’ai Smith writes “the art and the textile are integral to each other – the surface and the art become one” (4) subverting Kandinsky’s belief that abstraction (contemporary art context) would be achieved only once materials become subordinate to concept. (T’ai Smith BWT 23) Black understood weaving could make abstraction tangible. (336) 

Johannes Itten said the greatest achievements are the result of play overcoming labour. (T’ai Smith BWT 27) The Bauhaus philosophy was that end results could be sacrificed if learning was gained through the experimental process. (T’ai Smith BWT 53) In this way, contemporary tapestry weaving could be said to closely follow the six step scientific method: the weaver makes an observation that provokes a question that the weaver sets out to answer by hypothesizing, and predicting an outcome, then testing the hypothesis. Based on the results, the process is revised, which inevitably leads to urther inquiry, either along the same tangent or entirely new foci. Stolzl’s scientific perspective may have been in recognizing how tapestry challenges two dimensionality because the bottom layers predicate those that follow, more like architecture. (T’ai Smith BWT 27-28) Györy calls it a “2.5 D representation.” (148) Furthermore, Mathison describes the binary nature of tapestry; pictorial (e.g. William Morris) and structural (eg. Annie Albers), very unique processes visually and theoretically, coexisting within the same discipline. (Mathison 20) Glusica’s article about the power of weaving to illustrate wave/particle duality demonstrates a passion for both science and craft that recognizes and celebrates their commingling in her practice. Györy’s article explains the development of an “editor”, a computer program designed to analyze non rectilinear weaving structures in Andean textiles, and to create models derived by an algorithm, to illustrate their structure. Take that, painting and sculpture! 

Textiles have been constantly reassigned on the continuum between ornament and function. (Astington 119 Groot 3) Tapestry’s myriad purposes throughout its historical existence lie on a web tethered between various poles. From status conveyor, patronized by the rich and powerful, (Wilcox 10) to art (read artsy-craftsy) activity in pre school, to inaccurately categorized wall hangings, to provocateur in the realm of contemporary art, (Mathison 40) and so on. Around the world weaving may be newly embraced, (Mathison 41) or part of a country’s strong textile tradition. (Mathison 51) Mathison reiterates the importance of current generations embracing tapestry to ensure its continued existence. (54) Well, I will do my best.  

Works Cited 

Astington, John H. “Venus on the Thames.” Shakespeare Studies (0582-9399), vol. 39, Jan. 2011, pp. 117-132. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=67008627&site=ehost-live
Auther, Elissa. String Felt Thread: The Hierarchy of Art and Craft in American Art. University of Minnesota Press, 2010. 
Barber, Elizabeth Wayland. Women’s Work: The First 20000 Years. WW Norton & Company, 1994.  
Cross, L.D. “Woven, Not Carved: the Pangnirtung Tapestries Are Northern Art with Global Appeal.” Arctic, vol. 56, no. 3, Sept. 2003, p. 310. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=11016423&site=ehost-live. 
Darlaston, K. (2013). “The Generative Loom: Tapestry in the community.” Craft + Design Enquiry, 5, 35-48. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1506149821?accountid=8153  
Deacon, Deborah A. and Paule E. Calvin. War Imagery in Women’s Textiles. McFarland & Company, Inc., 2014. 
Findly, Ellison Banks. “Woven History: Identity and the past in Lao-Tai Weaving.” Journal of Intercultural Disciplines, vol. 10, Spring2012, pp. 56-67. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=109890930&site=ehost-live. 
Glusica, Katie. “The Seen and Unseen.” Leonardo, vol. 49, no. 2, Apr. 2016, pp. 130-136. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1162/LEON_a_00920. 
Gogarty, Amy. Jane Kidd: Handwork. Stride Gallery, 2003.
Green, Denise Nicole. “Mamuu—The Practice of Weaving.” Cahiers Metiers D’art / Craft Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, Sept. 2011, pp. 49-59. EBSCOhostsearch.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asu&AN=70498209&site=ehost-live
Groot, Marjan. ”Inscribing Women and Gender into Histories and Reception of Design, Crafts, and Decorative Arts of Small-Scale Non-European Cultures.” Journal of Art Historiography, vol. 12, June 2015, pp. 1-32. EBSCOhostsearch.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asu&AN=103323314&site=ehost-live. 
Györy, Georges. “Modelling Complex Non-Rectilinear Textile Structures.” International Journal of Humanities & Arts Computing: A Journal of Digital Humanities, vol. 10, no. 2, Oct. 2016, pp. 145-178. EBSCOhost, doi:10.3366/ijhac.2016.0165. 
Hearle, John W. S. “The 20Th-Century Revolution in Textile Machines and Processes. Part I: Spinning and Weaving.” Industrial Archaeology Review, vol. 35, no. 2, Nov. 2013, pp. 87-99. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1179/0309072813Z.00000000019. 
Hung, Shu. By Hand: The Use of Craft in Contemporary Art. Princeton Architectural Press, 2007.  
Johnson, Mark M. “Tradition and Innovation in Modern Tapestries.” Arts & Activities, vol. 139, no. 5, June 2006, pp. 37-39. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=20904866&site=ehost-live. 
Kooser, Ted. “A Shaman at your Service.” Shiela Hicks: Material Voices. Joslyn Art Museum, 2016, p. 10.  
Leigh, Mole. “Chronomanual Craft: Time Investment as a Value in Contemporary Western Craft.” Journal of Design History, vol. 15, no. 1, 2002, pp. 33-45. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3527089. 
Mathison, Fiona. “Tapestry in the Modern Day.” Tapestry: A Woven Narrative. Black Dog Publishing, 2011, pp. 20-63. 
Morton, Erin. “The Object of Therapy: Mary E. Black and the Progressive Possibilities of Weaving.” Utopian Studies: Journal of the Society for Utopian Studies, vol. 22, no. 2, 2011, pp. 321-340. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mzh&AN=2012306065&site=ehost-live 
Noegel, Scott B. “Evil Looms: Delilah–Weaver of Wicked Wiles.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly, vol. 79, no. 2, Apr. 2017, pp. 187-204. EBSCOhostsearch.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122364875&site=ehost-live. 
Quinton, Sarah, Curator. Why Bother? Handmade Textiles in the 21st Century. Textile Museum of Canada, 2003.  
Sahagún, Verónica. “Life Weavings: My Aesthetic Compass.” Visual Inquiry: Learning & Teaching Art, vol. 3, no. 2, June 2014, pp. 108-111.
EBSCOhost,doi:10.1386/vi.3.2.108_7. 
Salom, Andrée. “Weaving Potential Space and Acculturation: Art Therapy at the Museum.” Journal of Applied Arts & Health, vol. 6, no. 1, June 2015, pp. 47-62.  
EBSCOhost, doi:10.1386/jaah.6.1.47_1. 
Sherwin, Skye. “The woman who kept Hitler and Churchill in stitches: Hannah Ryggen Woven Histories review.” https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2017/nov/14/hannah-ryggen-woven-histories-review-modern-art-oxford. 
Shuzhong, H., & Prott, L. Survival, Revival and Continuance: The Menglian Weaving Revival Project. International Journal of Cultural Property, 20(2), 2013, pp. 201-219. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0940739113000052. 
Smith, T’ai. Bauhaus Weaving Theory: From Feminine Craft to Mode of Design. University of Minnesota Press, 2014. (BWT). 
– – – . “Pictures Made of Wool”: The Gender of Labor at the Bauhaus Weaving Workshop (1919-23).” Invisible Culture, no. 4, Spring2002, pp. 1-7. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asu&AN=59633670&site=ehost-live. 
Smith, Yda J., et al. “The Meaning and Value of Traditional Occupational Practice: A Karen Woman’s Story of Weaving in the United States.” Work, vol. 45, no. 1, May 2013, pp. 25-30. EBSCOhost, doi:10.3233/WOR-131600. 
Weissberg, L. (2010). Ariadne’s thread. Mln, 125(3), 661-681,730. Retrieved from  
https://search.proquest.com/docview/734377924?accountid=8153 
Whitford, Frank. Understanding Abstract Art. Penguin, 1987.  
Wilcox, Timothy. “Tapestry from the Middle Ages to the Enlightenment”  Tapestry: A Woven Narrative. Black Dog Publishing, 2011, pp. 10-19.  
 

Author’s Byline 
Wendy Lauzon is a retired educator who has just completed a Bachelor of Fine Arts, Fibre, at the Alberta College of Art + Design, in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, where she lives with her husband, Don. She compulsively explores all aspects of fibre arts in her home studio. This is a revised version of her unpublished Grad Paper.